Barcelona lost points again last night in a draw against Atletico Madrid. Atletico's Soul Negus equalized for the team by scoring twice from the penalty spot. But the rationale for the two penalties has been questioned

, with Barcelona drawing against Celta Vigo a few days ago. First go ahead, then end the game with a goal. The trend continued yesterday.

This time Barca lost points at home. Two goals were not enough for Barারa to win. Atletico took advantage of the two penalties and left the field with a draw. The match ended in a 2-2 draw. Both Atletico and Bar দুইa are disappointed, with Real Madrid players watching the match from 600 miles away. Barাa draw that the league title is almost in the hands of Real. Real Madrid is one point ahead of Bar দুইa (60 points) in the top two. Zinedine Zidane's team will play against Getafe tomorrow night.

The decision to fight for the title has been decided by the fact that there are controversies over the two penalties given against Bar কালa tomorrow. Let's discuss the first penalty first. Diego Costa's own goal gave Atletico a 1-0 lead. In the 15th minute of the match, the Belgian winger Yannick Ferreira Carrasco got the ball from his own boundary and attacked with great speed. Although Barca defender Pique easily crossed the barrier, Arturo Vidal fouled him in the D-box. He is also another 'drama' in the penalty.
Costa's penalty shot was blocked by Barাa goalkeeper Mark Andre Ter Stegen. But after a while it turned out, no, Stegen blocked the shot ‘illegally’. Stegen left his goal line before Costa's shot. And the German star has to pay for that mistake. He sees the yellow card. As a result, the referee asked to take the penalty again. This time Costa did not come to take the penalty. It was not wrong to score a goal.

The decision to cancel the penalty taken by Costa has caused outrage in the Barাa camp. But Madrid-based Spanish media marker referee expert Anduzar Oliver said Costa's decision to cancel the penalty was the right one. When taking a penalty, many goalkeepers get up from the line and try to reduce their circular angular distance with the footballer taking the penalty, which is not correct. VAR pointed out Stegen's mistake with a finger in the eye. So there is no room for debate on this decision.

Another drama in the 62nd minute of the match. Bar্সa then went ahead 2-1. Once again, a Bar্সa star threw Carasco into the penalty box, this time Nelson Semedo. Once again, Sol Niges equalized for Atletico by scoring from the penalty spot. However, there is a heated debate over whether Karasco had enough connections with Semedo to fall. Even as seen in various videos at the end of the match, Semedo was hit in the knee with a light blow to Carasco, the Belgian winger from Atletico then kicked his own leg and then went on a rampage. Semedo did not tackle him that way. The referee could have given the penalty if he wanted.
The marquee did not say anything about this penalty. However, Spanish football expert Sid Lowe wrote in the English daily The Guardian, 'He (Carasco) has fallen on his own two feet. But the question here is whether he (Semedor) was touched before. Like the referee decided. Semedo did not protest, but the break was unusually short to test the decision.